Evaluasi Kesuksesan Penerapan Sistem Informasi di LPPM STMIK STIKOM Indonesia

Main Article Content

I Kadek Budi Sandika
Hamid Hamid

Abstract

Information systems that have been developed and used need to be evaluated. Measuring the success of the application of an information system must take into account at least four parameters, namely the individual who uses it, the organization where individuals interact, the information the system presents, and the information technology itself. This study also examined whether there is a direct correlation between user experience and organizational support for net benefits. This research was carried out in three stages, from the preparation, data collection, to data analysis and reporting. Based on the results of testing the research hypothesis, only one hypothesis was accepted (significant), namely the relationship between the quality of information systems, the use of information systems, user satisfaction and net profits. Based on the results of testing and discussion, the application (sitasi) is still not fully successful. There are several obstacles found in its operations, both in terms of system quality, information quality, and the quality of citation services

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

[1] S. Alter, “Defining Information Systems as Work Systems : Implications for the IS Field,” San Fransisco, 22, 2008.
[2] E. D. Falkenberg et al., “A FRAMEWORK OF INFORMATION SYSTEM CONCEPTS,” Leiden, 1998.
[3] N. A. K. S. Mohamadali and J. M. Garibaldi, “A Novel Evaluation Model of User Acceptance of Software Technology in Healthcare Sector,” in International Conference on Health Informatics, 2010, pp. 392–397.
[4] J. Iivari and R. Hirschheim, “ANALYZING INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT : A COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF EIGHT IS DEVELOPMENT,” Inf. Syst., vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 551–575, 1996.
[5] M. K. Sharma, “A study of SDLC to develop well engineered software,” Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 520–523, 2017.
[6] Ł. Wiechetek, “SUCCESS FACTORS AND BARRIERS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF IT SYSTEMS : THE CASE OF POLISH SMEs,” in Managing Intellectual Capital and Innovation for Sustainable and Inclusive Society, 2013, pp. 1475–1486.
[7] D. A. Chevers and G. Grant, “Developer’s Views on Information Systems Quality and Success in Canadian Software Development Firms,” J. Inf. Syst. Technol. Manag., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 3–20, 2017, doi: 10.4301/S1807-17752017000100001.
[8] P. Hallikainen and L. Chen, “A Holistic Framework on Information Systems Evaluation with a Case Analysis,” Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Eval., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 57–64, 2005.
[9] R. Stockdale and C. Standing, “An interpretive approach to evaluating information systems : A content , context , process framework,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 173, no. 2006, pp. 1090–1102, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.07.006.
[10] W. Piotrowicz and Z. Irani, “INFORMATION SYSTEMS EVALUATION IN CONTEXT – IMPACT OF THE CORPORATE LEVEL,” in European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems 2008, 2008, vol. 2008, pp. 1–13.
[11] F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, “User Acceptance of Computer Technology : A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Manage. Sci., vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 982–1003, 1989, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
[12] W. H. Delone and E. R. Mclean, “Information Systems Success Revisited,” in Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002, pp. 1–11.
[13] A. Ć. Samardžija, “MEASURING THE SUCCESS OF THE INTERACTIVE MOBILE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AT THE INDIVIDUAL LEVEL OF USE DOCTORAL THESIS,” University of Zagreb, 2016.
[14] B. H. Wixom and P. A. Todd, “A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance,” Inf. Sist. Res., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 85–102, 2005.
[15] D. Xu, I. Benbasat, and R. T. Cenfetelli, “Integrating Service Quality with System and Information Quality : An Empirical Test in the E-Service Context,” MIS Q., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 777–794, 2013.