User Experience (UX) Evaluation of the OVO Application Using the System Usability Scale (SUS) Method

Main Article Content

Hikam Rizqillah Munandar

Abstract

OVO, an e-wallet company, introduced the OVO application as part of its digital strategy to cater to customer needs and stay competitive in the digital era. This study aims to assess the User Experience (UX) of the OVO application using the System Usability Scale (SUS) method. The research focuses on understanding user perceptions regarding functionality, intuitiveness, visual design, performance, support, and security aspects of the OVO application. The research methodology employed the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire, which consists of structured questions to gauge user satisfaction and usability. The study participants were active users of the OVO application

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

I. HN, P. Nugroho, R. F.-J. I. Jurnal, and undefined 2015, “Pengujian usability website menggunakan system usability scale,” jurnal.kominfo.go.idIA HN, PI Nugroho, R FerdianaJURNAL IPTEKKOM Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan & Teknologi Informasi, 2015•jurnal.kominfo.go.id, Accessed: Nov. 13, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.kominfo.go.id/index.php/iptekkom/article/view/428

M. W.- Humaniora and undefined 2011, “User Experience (UX) sebagai bagian dari pemikiran desain dalam pendidikan tinggi desain komunikasi visual,” journal.binus.ac.idMB WiryawanHumaniora, 2011•journal.binus.ac.id, Accessed: Nov. 13, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://journal.binus.ac.id/index.php/Humaniora/article/view/3166

J. B.-U. evaluation in industry and undefined 1996, “SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale,” taylorfrancis.com, Accessed: Nov. 13, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781498710411-35/sus-quick-dirty-usability-scale-john-brooke

J. B.-U. evaluation in industry and undefined 1996, “SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale,” taylorfrancis.com, Accessed: Nov. 13, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781498710411-35/sus-quick-dirty-usability-scale-john-brooke

A. Bangor, P. Kortum, J. M.-J. of usability studies, and undefined 2009, “Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale,” uxpajournal.org, Accessed: Nov. 13, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://uxpajournal.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/pdf/JUS_Bangor_May2009.pdf

F. J. García-Peñalvo, A. García-Holgado, A. Vázquez-Ingelmo, and A. M. Seoane-Pardo, “Usability test of WYRED platform,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 10924 LNCS, pp. 73–84, 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-91743-6_5.

T. Tullis, J. S.-U. professional association, and undefined 2004, “A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability,” researchgate.netTS Tullis, JN StetsonUsability professional association conference, 2004•researchgate.net, Accessed: Nov. 14, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Thomas-Tullis/publication/228609327_A_Comparison_of_Questionnaires_for_Assessing_Website_Usability/links/0912f50e4fe12066fd000000/A-Comparison-of-Questionnaires-for-Assessing-Website-Usability.pdf

J. B.-J. of usability studies and undefined 2013, “SUS: a retrospective.,” uxpajournal.org, Accessed: Nov. 13, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://uxpajournal.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/pdf/JUS_Brooke_February_2013.pdf

J. W. Creswell, A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications, 2014.