Perbandingan Rencana Anggaran Biaya (RAB) Rumah Konvensional dan Rumah RISHA di Kota Banjarmasin
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31961/gradasi.v3i2.783Keywords:
Rencana Anggaran Biaya, RISHA, Rumah Tipe 36Abstract
Masih banyak sebagian orang yang belum memenuhi kebutuhan kepemilikan rumah karena faktor ekonomi bagi masyarakat yang berpenghasilan rendah dan juga faktor dari bencana alam sehingga diperlukan rancangan bangunan yang memenuhi standar dengan kualitas baik dan harga terjangkau seperti rumah dengan teknologi RISHA. Dari permasalahan tersebut maka pada penelitian ini akan dilakukan penelitian mengenai perbandingan rencana anggaran biaya (RAB)Rumah Instan Sederhana Sehat (RISHA) dengan rumah konvensional tipe 36 pada salah satu perumahan di wilayah Banjarmasin Timur. Metode deskriptif dan komparatif digunakan dalam penyelesaian penelitian ini. Kedua metode ini digunakan untuk menggambarkan semua data yang kemudian dianalisa dan dibandingkan berdasarkan kenyataan secara langsung. Hasil rencana anggaran biaya (RAB)untuk rumah konvensional sebesar Rp122.355.689 (Seratus Dua Puluh Dua Juta Tiga Ratus Lima Puluh Lima Ribu Enam Ratus Delapan Puluh Sembilan Rupiah) dan hasil rencana anggaran biaya (RAB)rumah RISHA sebesar Rp. Rp119.640.109,00 (Seratus Sembilan Belas Juta Enam Ratus Empat Puluh Ribu Seratus Sembilan Rupiah) dengan selisih rencana anggaran biaya (RAB) antara kedua rumah tersebut sebesar Rp2.715.580,00 (Dua Juta Tujuh Ratus Lima Belas Ribu Lima Ratus Delapan Puluh Rupiah) dengan perbandingan sebesar 2,22%.
Abstract
There are still many people who have not met the needs of home ownership due to economic factors for low income people and also factors from natural disasters so that building designs that meet standards of good quality and affordable prices such as houses with RISHA technology are needed. From these problems, this research will conduct a research on the comparison of the budget plan of Simple Healthy Instant Homes (RISHA) with conventional houses of type 36 in one housing complex in East Banjarmasin. Descriptive and comparative methods are used in the completion of this research. Both of these methods are used to describe all data which is then analyzed and compared based on reality directly. The results of the planned budget for a conventional house of Rp122,355,689,00 (One Hundred Twenty Two Million Three Hundred Fifty Five Thousand Six Hundred Eighty Nine Rupiah) and the results of RISHA's housing cost budget plan of Rp119.640.109,00 (One Hundred Nineteen Million Six Hundred Forty Thousand Hundred Nine Rupiah) with the difference in the planned budget between the two houses amounting to Rp2.715.580,00 (Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Five Hundred Eighty Rupiah) at a ratio of 2.22%.
Downloads
References
Fitriana, Vofi 2010. “Pengertian Rencana Anggaran Biayaâ€Â. (http://vofifitriana.blogspot.com/2010/09/pengertian-rencana-anggaran- biaya.html, diakses tanggal 2 Mei 2019).
Ibrahim, Bachtiar. 2015. “Rencana Dan Estimate Real of Costâ€Â. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Manullang, Rio. 2018. “Buku Pintar Menghitung Anggaran Biaya Bangunanâ€Â. Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI.
Mukomoko, J. A. 1994. “Dasar Penyususnan Anggaran Biaya Bangunanâ€Â. Jakarta: Gaya Media Pratama
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perumahan dan Permukiman (PUSLITBANG). 2015. “RISHA Rumah Instan Sederhana Sehatâ€Â. Bandung.
(eproduklitbang.pu.go.id, diakses tanggal 26 November 2018).
Putranto, A. D. (2013) ‘Pengembangan Rumah Sederhana Sehat (RSH) Menjadi Rumah Sederhana Sehat Berwawasan Lingkungan Di Kabupaten Malang’, Ruas, 11(02). Available at: https://ruas.ub.ac.id/index.php/ruas/article/view/140.
Rafik, A. and Hadi, S. (2011) ‘Pengaruh Rancangan Denah Terhadap Rencana anggaran biaya (RAB)Rumah Tipe 36 Di Kota Banjarbaru Kalimantan Selatan’, Poros Teknik, 03(02). Available at: http://ejurnal.poliban.ac.id/index.php/porosteknik/article/view/43.
Ramadhani, V., Hasyim, H. and Unas, S. El (2015) ‘PERBANDINGAN RENCANA ANGGARAN BIAYA (RAB)RUMAH MPANEL DENGAN RUMAH PRACETAK PADA PEMBANGUNAN RUMAH SEDERHANA DI SAWOJAJAR MALANG’, Mahasiswa Jurusan Teknik Sipil, 1(2), p. 9. Available at: http://sipil.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/jmts/article/view/240.
Widiasanti, Irika dan Lenggogeni. 2014. “Manajemen Konstruksiâ€Â. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in Jurnal Gradasi Teknik Sipil agree to the following terms:
- Publication rights for all journal manuscript materials published/published in this Jurnal Gradasi Teknik Sipil are held by the Editorial Board with the knowledge of the author (copyright remains with the author).
- The formal legal provisions for accessing digital articles in this electronic journal are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA) license, which means that the Jurnal Gradasi Teknik Sipil has the right to store, transfer media/format, manage in the form of a database, maintain, and publish articles without asking permission from the Author as long as the Author's name is included as the Copyright owner.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .
- Printed and electronically issued/published manuscripts are open access for education, research and library purposes. Apart from these purposes, the editorial board is not responsible for violations of copyright laws
